Below is a summary from Sugar Land
criminal defense lawyer Rosario Stornello of several recent criminal cases which have made
U.S. Supreme Court
D's Kansas conviction for concealing unnamed pills in his sock did
not trigger removal under 8 U.S.C. §1227(a)(2)(B)(i). Mellouli v.
Lynch, No. 13-1034 (U.S. June 1, 2015).
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
In prosecution for alien-harboring conspiracy and substantive alien-harboring
charges, district court harmlessly erred in admitting, pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim. P. 404(b), evidence of a 2009 traffic stop (not culminating in
arrest or prosecution), in which D was discovered to have two aliens in
his vehicle. United States v. Gutierrez-Mendez, 752 F.3d 418 (5th Cir. 2014).
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
D's statute-of-limitations defense was a category-three forfeitable
right because there was no legislative violation of the Ex Post Facto
Clause, given that the trial judge's acceptance of the time-barred
plea originated from plea negotiations with the State and D's waivers
of the defense. Ex parte Heilman, 456 S.W.3d 159 (Tex.Crim.App. 2015).
14th Texas Court of Appeals
D's conviction for fraudulent possession of 10 or more but less than
50 items of identifying information was improper because he suffered egregious
harm from the inclusion of an unconstitutional mandatory presumption in
the jury charge. Ramirez-Memije v. State, No. 14-11-00456-CR (Tex.App.-Sugar Land
[14 Dist] May 19, 2015).
Award-Winning Defense You Can Count On
Whether you are facing misdemeanor or felony charges, there is no doubt
that Attorney Stornello has the drive and determination to pursue your
best outcome. Selected for the Houstonia Top Lawyers list for three consecutive
years and recognized as a member of the American Institute of Criminal
Law Attorneys, he can be trusted with the details of your case.
Your future is simply too important to sit back and do nothing.
Get in touch with our experienced Sugar Land criminal defense attorneys today –
we are on your side.